Mandelbrot again

and now that he’s dead, I know who he is.

old too soon. Smart too late. Me not him.

That’s life, isn’t that the truth?

In his fractal research, he saw that as you had better tools to measure the coastline in more detail, the coastline became longer and longer. For the whole story, go here. For the short version, keep reading…

Mandelbrot tips off the markets

By Christopher Caldwell

Published: October 22 2010 21:39 | Last updated: October 22 2010 21:39.

“Economics is a science of fashions – Keynes and ‘pump-priming’ at one time, Friedman and monetarism at another,” the Franco-American mathematician, Benoît Mandelbrot, who died last week at 85, wrote in The (Mis)behaviour of Markets, a book he co-authored with Richard L. Hudson in 2004. “The profession burns through new theories the way a teenager hops from one new date to another: it meets them, spends some time with them, examines them, finds what it thinks are flaws, and then drops them for a newer face.” If the condescension and intellectual vanity are typical of Mandelbrot’s writing, so is the fearlessness and general good sense.

When Mandelbrot began writing about markets half a century ago, he was struck by the similarity between his studies of the coastline and how markets worked. Markets “scaled,” he said.

Studying the history of cotton prices, he formed an impression, shared with many physicists and economists, that “all charts look alike”. Without the legends, you can’t tell whether you are looking at a century’s worth of data or a day’s. If anything, scalability was more pronounced in money than in science. All such charts were hard to read, because of the way chance creates “spurious patterns and pseudo-cycles.”

From here, he went on to study math that financial analysts use to build their positions, but as time went on, he became less impressed with the theories.

Analytical models, he found, underestimated risk. There were “Joseph” effects – seven fat years here, seven lean years. And the “Noah” effects, when the floods hit. And there were many more floods that do not actually get calculated into the formulas.

It’s the cataclysms that unmake the investor, he said.

“Wild price swings, business failures, windfall trading profits – these are key phenomena. In all their drama and power, they should matter most to bankers, regulators and investors.”

Benoit B. Mandelbrot

Remember when I posted about the Mandelbox?

Well, here’s some light on the subject…

Benoît Mandelbrot, Novel Mathematician, Dies at 85
By JASCHA HOFFMAN
Published: October 16, 2010

Benoit B. Mandelbrot

Benoît B. Mandelbrot, a maverick mathematician who developed the field of fractal geometry and applied it to physics, biology, finance and many other fields, died on Thursday in Cambridge, Mass. He was 85.

The cause was pancreatic cancer, his wife, Aliette, said. He had lived in Cambridge.

Dr. Mandelbrot coined the term “fractal” to refer to a new class of mathematical shapes whose uneven contours could mimic the irregularities found in nature.

“Applied mathematics had been concentrating for a century on phenomena which were smooth, but many things were not like that: the more you blew them up with a microscope the more complexity you found,” said David Mumford, a professor of mathematics at Brown University. “He was one of the primary people who realized these were legitimate objects of study.”

In a seminal book, “The Fractal Geometry of Nature,” published in 1982, Dr. Mandelbrot defended mathematical objects that he said others had dismissed as “monstrous” and “pathological.” Using fractal geometry, he argued, the complex outlines of clouds and coastlines, once considered unmeasurable, could now “be approached in rigorous and vigorous quantitative fashion.”

For most of his career, Dr. Mandelbrot had a reputation as an outsider to the mathematical establishment. From his perch as a researcher for I.B.M. in New York, where he worked for decades before accepting a position at Yale University, he noticed patterns that other researchers may have overlooked in their own data, then often swooped in to collaborate.

“He knew everybody, with interests going off in every possible direction,” Professor Mumford said. “Every time he gave a talk, it was about something different.”

Dr. Mandelbrot traced his work on fractals to a question he first encountered as a young researcher: how long is the coast of Britain? The answer, he was surprised to discover, depends on how closely one looks. On a map an island may appear smooth, but zooming in will reveal jagged edges that add up to a longer coast. Zooming in further will reveal even more coastline.

“Here is a question, a staple of grade-school geometry that, if you think about it, is impossible,” Dr. Mandelbrot told The New York Times earlier this year in an interview. “The length of the coastline, in a sense, is infinite.”

In the 1950s, Dr. Mandelbrot proposed a simple but radical way to quantify the crookedness of such an object by assigning it a “fractal dimension,” an insight that has proved useful well beyond the field of cartography.

Over nearly seven decades, working with dozens of scientists, Dr. Mandelbrot contributed to the fields of geology, medicine, cosmology and engineering. He used the geometry of fractals to explain how galaxies cluster, how wheat prices change over time and how mammalian brains fold as they grow, among other phenomena.

His influence has also been felt within the field of geometry, where he was one of the first to use computer graphics to study mathematical objects like the Mandelbrot set, which was named in his honor.

“I decided to go into fields where mathematicians would never go because the problems were badly stated,” Dr. Mandelbrot said. “I have played a strange role that none of my students dare to take.”

Benoît B. Mandelbrot (he added the middle initial himself, though it does not stand for a middle name) was born on Nov. 20, 1924, to a Lithuanian Jewish family in Warsaw. In 1936 his family fled the Nazis, first to Paris and then to the south of France, where he tended horses and fixed tools.

After the war he enrolled in the École Polytechnique in Paris, where his sharp eye compensated for a lack of conventional education. His career soon spanned the Atlantic. He earned a master’s degree in aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, returned to Paris for his doctorate in mathematics in 1952, then went on to the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J., for a postdoctoral degree under the mathematician John von Neumann.

After several years spent largely at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Paris, Dr. Mandelbrot was hired by I.B.M. in 1958 to work at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center in Yorktown Heights, N.Y. Although he worked frequently with academic researchers and served as a visiting professor at Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, it was not until 1987 that he began to teach at Yale, where he earned tenure in 1999.

Dr. Mandelbrot received more than 15 honorary doctorates and served on the board of many scientific journals, as well as the Mandelbrot Foundation for Fractals. Instead of rigorously proving his insights in each field, he said he preferred to “stimulate the field by making bold and crazy conjectures” — and then move on before his claims had been verified. This habit earned him some skepticism in mathematical circles.

“He doesn’t spend months or years proving what he has observed,” said Heinz-Otto Peitgen, a professor of mathematics and biomedical sciences at the University of Bremen. And for that, he said, Dr. Mandelbrot “has received quite a bit of criticism.”

“But if we talk about impact inside mathematics, and applications in the sciences,” Professor Peitgen said, “he is one of the most important figures of the last 50 years.”

Besides his wife, Dr. Mandelbrot is survived by two sons, Laurent, of Paris, and Didier, of Newton, Mass., and three grandchildren.

When asked to look back on his career, Dr. Mandelbrot compared his own trajectory to the rough outlines of clouds and coastlines that drew him into the study of fractals in the 1950s.

“If you take the beginning and the end, I have had a conventional career,” he said, referring to his prestigious appointments in Paris and at Yale. “But it was not a straight line between the beginning and the end. It was a very crooked line.”

Bitchinate

Bitchy terms

Borrowing from Physiology, to supinate is to have a hand with the palm facing up. To bitchinate is to slap a person with the palm of your hand. In other words, it is a shorter term for a bitch slap, plus it makes you sound more intelligent.

– by Knee Wrote Aug 17, 2005

I didn’t write this. Knee wrote it. But, I thought she or he has an interesting way with words…

Yes, I know she's using a fly-swatter. Is that more intelligent?

six rules

Michael Steinhardt

Saw this post this morning, Six Rules by Michael Steinhardt,  successful hedge fund manager. One dollar invested with Steinhardt Partners LP, his flagship hedge fund, at its launch in 1967 would have been worth $481 when Steinhardt retired in 1995.

Although this focuses on money, I think it may pertain to many other aspects of our lives.  Alas, too late for me for the first! I never listened to anybody, and, later, I thought that might be the reason why I got into trouble. Hmmm. If Steinhardt is right, does this mean I would have done even worse?! For #2, although I now do what I love, I found that some of the jobs that I didn’t like actually taught me some really important lessons that were, in fact, building blocks or stepping stones. Life is very strange!

Anyway, here goes with Steinhardt’s Six Rules:

  1. Make all your mistakes early in life. The more tough lessons you learn early on, the fewer errors you make later. (A common mistake of all young investors is to be too trusting with brokers, analysts, and newsletters who are trying to sell you bad stocks.)
  2. Always make your living doing something you enjoy. This way, you devote your full intensity to it which is required for success over the long-term.
  3. Be intellectually competitive. This involves doing constant research on subjects that make you money. The trick, he says, in plowing through such data is to be able to sense a major change coming in a situation before anyone else.
  4. Make good decisions even with incomplete information. In the real world, he argues, investors never have all the data they need before they put their money at risk. You will never have all the information you need. What matters is what you do with the information you have. Do your homework and focus on the facts that matter most in any investing situation.
  5. Always trust your intuition. For Steinhardt, intuition is more than just a hunch. He says intuition resembles a hidden supercomputer in the mind that you’re not even aware is there. It can help you do the right thing at the right time if you give it a chance. In fact, over time your own trading experience will help develop your intuition so that major pitfalls can be avoided.
  6. Don’t make small investments. You only have so much time and energy so when you put your money in play. So, if you’re going to put money at risk, make sure the reward is high enough to justify it.

* This report was originally published by The Kirk Report on June 2, 2004. I pulled it today from Barry Ritholtz’s blog.